Not Fully Re(!)d Yet

Also too prolific[!]
(sc)(b.s.)
Original Intent !
Parallel Blogs[!]


c-labels


[!]2: Not exactly.
!
(fp1)
[ha! hints abound[!]]
(Read,) red, Reid, Read, Blew?.

PIT Spot?

Meta-cystical point or so duh?


Not to pump the mess anger or dis-road improvements. 


i.e. change of(4) course


At this point, I will refrain from inserting links to confound or unfuse the above.
My O.I. is in the Lab3ls [!]


A.  NFRY
B.  Meta-slash
C.  Ribble
4.  P.C.




RSN: Smallest Font- Unread, Normal Font- Read, Small Font (or bold)- of special interest
Nicholas Kristof New York Times, Agence France-Presse,  David Remnick, The New Yorker, Jason Rosenbaum, National Public Radio, (...under construction)   Frank Rich, New York Magazine
TO: (...Under Construction)   .Yana Kunichoff, Truthout | Interview..


Spoiler alert?  The Last Word, Howard Dean ? IBT: wps 

We have met the yogurt

and whom art thou?


~ Pogo[.][!]


FN: The Tractatus takes a break?
(FP1)
New Label(Nexus)

msnbc 48669371

[Rough Draft: 4-28-14]

 GPS  (The Last Word: SNL Republican War Hypocrisy Ryan***)

Google Parsed Sector :  Trigger Alert [!]

Uncle Sam ?

[4-29-14]
Fox Cutters Consolidated [!] ?  [**]
8 Track Mine ?

The Cycle
(Pulitzer Leaks)
Inequality Inflation
Milibank Jobs
You Crane(Ukraine)
Crisis Angle
Coal Bear (Colbert)

...promote the general...
The Last Word
Not Quite Yet ...
I missed a* Hume.

*Connecting the Dots
Kant we get along...
PC [^]
Between Iraq and a Hard Work!

[**] The  Dickens  you say  . . .  ?

Bah bah bah bah bah a ram beau.

The Beach Boy sheep(1) and the Dixie Check(*)? 

(1.)  [a.] Mmmm MOW, MOW, [b.] R.S.V.P., c.Red Bull..., [d.] Tin Foil Herman
(*) spell check[!]

3-6-14 un-reads.
M-beds

Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?

(1864-1917) Humanism, How is "exactness" possible*?
(1775-1854) Transcendental Idealism
Newtonian venn?**

* I will do little more than indicate Schopenhauer's relation to Hegel under Runes, let alone Schlick.(The Construction of Theories)
** Hobbes Squaring the Circle pre-Newton/Liebniz.

Ribble? re: nacre?
Hint?

12-27-13 Hobbes (b.s.)^  and Schlick(wiki) links inserted.

^ A(2) ? genre fishing ? ! ?

Pre-Mod L? (1588-1679)(1642-1727)(1646-1716)  So there was some overlap. Hobbes was mocked for trying to square the circle pre-calculus or pre-hyperbolic geometry. ? ! (lost roots ! ? [a, b, c ] ) (spoiler alert => OW do not scroll)

Filibuster Bluster*

Belated call.
Senate to debate gun control, sort of.
Not to Maddow** it.

*68-31
** (FP!)***

a, b, c, d ... ? ! ?
[a long way to fine men]

4-12-13 So neither of us have to.[!] ?  Knot !
*** Footnotes Page inserted
(Follow Up ? [!]) That's the ticket. Who's serious!
Not to have completed a ribble.

4-13-13 Note: Bane or Fineman (under 4-12-13) Stay tuned [?] !
4-15-13 Of similar note ? Thatcher Notes ?

HAPPY V-DAY!

to conintue *
the Hiatus **
of sorts.

* (anachronism)
OW**!

Forbes Thought Of The Day

“Vision is the art of seeing things invisible.”
— Jonathan Swift

** further OW.(or EW?)

[UPDATE: D-Day My apologies to Marco Rubio and Beevis, I am not that familiar with the latter character's nature but I believe the former is not going for laughs, water bottle aside.  I also don't know if I besmirched the character of Butthead by comparing him to Rand Paul, and I don't really know which of the two SOTU responses are further from having a grasp of nature or economics. 

Try-Mentionalism ?[!]

Speaking of Tri[...]*
Think Progress had it's three(best) of the week.

I'm not saying...
I haven't even red[!].

Circular file f(n)or foot in mouth?
Putting myself in other's shoes is more challenging when in their mouths.
This boot strap(lede link) is not the case.
It is a challenge, not that it is in anyone's mouth or maybe only in mine. 
You know, statistics and things...

*reading in progress
[!]: (sic) sars(chasm)

Preface to FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012

Jolly Roger?  October Motif?
R,R,R! Or Simon Says?  (Right off the bat...)(*fn) 

September(**fn) Archive.
closing 10-1-12 Forward to FOOTNOTES: continue here: FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012  ]


NOT TO MITT-FLOP: but I will process the footnotes scrolling down in time as opposed to September's format.

[[]]
10-1-12
IN FACT SCRATCH THIS AS PREFACE OF SORTS.
[EDITOR"S NOTE: SEE FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012 Continued there. ]
10-1-12
[[]]

[]
[10-1-12 preemptive post to month of October.]
(*fn) =footnote on (FOOTNOTES OCTOBER...)
[bat= pun on Halloween and my going right off track with the footnotes protocol]
Not to trickle-down. (Scroll over for Ribble?)
B'log Search(b.s.): jolly + roger ( a, b )
October: Walking the Plank[!]
Motif: (b.s.) PEG'd ( a , b )
(**fn) Still some in draft for September.
(Ribble= ribbing/riddle  Hint: a bit of a pin the foot on the pirate.)
[] braketed close of asterisks to Forward.


FLASHNOTE: 10-5-12  http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/presidential-debate-top-7-romney-comments-youd-swear-he-could-never-have-said-but-did/news/2012/10/03/50276NOT!  OCTOBER NO SUPRISE!
Nor: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/10/04/958801/at-last-nights-debate-romney-told-27-myths-in-38-minutes/

First Debate: Zinger Score 2 to -1:  (comcast log)"take" etc.
Tough reviews for Jim Lehrer as debate moderator.
Romney barrels out of first debate on offense.
FACT CHECK: Presidential debate missteps.
Obama: Jobs report shows economy is on right track.>?
What the?  Ouch* < ! 

Replacement Refs or Not... 
I can't keep up with the debate ball of wax, or FOX-coop and egg heading. 
Post Ouch^*:
"spiracy":The Vice President Rolls
"math+godliness": My Respects to Those who Celebrate.
Might be maybe?

10-7-12 <*> "debate" http://xfinity.comcast.net/video/McCain-Romney-wins-first-debate-but-/2287378762/FoxNews/newest/ <*> 

Braking Emale[!]

Consult* a  Congress ...person?


[!]= (sic) sarcasm / irony
[earlier two read]
Ribble:  What a Lefty Rush might have said about congressional testimony on the subject?
[Talk about a fluke: sorry to mix a ribble with real news.]
* actual most current email

[8-1-12:  Belated ** Fluke or Not ?  My original intent centered on one of two organizations, which I hoped to touch upon.  With irony I let the ribble rest in immodest irreverence.  The answer to my riddle is something I would not have put it past Gore Vidal to answer, but I will go no further than my hint in comment.]

** Nexus of tortured rhetoric : Not to be a Lefty Rush.

The Hope

and changey thing.

Honeymoon*?  We barely dated.

[not so random** google]

* Ctrl F "hope"
** random squared (or cubed)
(not so reducks)
[NPR continued parts ]
[Tribute*** to Will Shortz and E.B. White, if not M.C. Escher.]
*** heckuva semantical
[See comment 2]
< previous post >

G'Ribble

Grand Ribble?
Everything is a meta4 con scious con science.
Guess what book I am reading.

Note: not in the links
Ribble defined: Ribbing and Riddle.

On a tangent, buy George*.

* update

[D'Ribble Not]
[My original intent was not to mock but to insert two images, but will suffice with the previous line. This will not necessarily answer what book I am reading but it is all about cause and effect dynamics.]

[7-7-11 Hint]

Tall Ebb and Try Pod.

Taleb and Tri-pod.

Bingo: Hint scroll over
[Footnote: another Try Pod]

[If some have problems with the President, how would they handle even more heat from the kitchen.]
[For later digging: Clams or C-shells...but my original intent was in the context of the Halperin/Evans political/media calculus or shore.]

[7-6-11 Follow-up: Rachel Maddow*, Chris Matthews**, Chris Hayes***, Last Word?*4. Not Quite. Tax & Spend R.I.P.* 3:25 and 11:00 economic brick, Rube Goldberg(Frank Rich)
** Sen. McCaskill Joan Walsh
*** David Frum, Eugene Robinson (& David Brooks)
*4 Do Nothing Congress]

High8US

[7-6-11 links added]

(continued)
In ConText:
Over Helming.
Underwhelmed?
HiAteUS
Humpty Dumpty...
Ideology
Connecting the Dots
Way, Too Point Oh?
Way[!]
No Frackin' Way
Image Processing
Re:Verb
'nuff said
Ledership[!]
Antithesis of Nuance

Related sites:
Finance and Mandelbrot
Reader Supported News
Instutute for New Economic Thinking (Flip-flop and Obliquity)
The New Yorker*
The Economist
YouTube

Calm Pend I um? (or E'em)

*Footnote: Thank Finance and Mandelbrot for The New Yorker and The Economist links [also: errors(not fully read yet) and thank the Democrats for the YouTube.]

BTW: The above image and photo, did not turn out(inserted) as intended, not that there is anything wrong with that. (Sign Feld Pun )["Close enough for government work".[!] ]
[Writer's Almanac: KUOW, Natural Gas, Regenerating, Life After, Burning: Inslee and much More.]

What is a slut?

Tracy Clark-Flory in Salon draws an interesting conclusion:

The trouble is that everyone has a different idea of where that line is. It's all very subjective, because how many partners is too many? How much cleavage is too much? When does flirting cross the line? As feminist activist Jaclyn Friedman explained in her SlutWalk Boston speech, "That's how the word 'slut' usually works. If you ask 10 people, you get 10 different definitions" -- and, of course, therein lies its power.

I won't define or defend the word or its use. But my original comment or lede had to do with Trumping the word, or flushing a show. There is no profundity in having to explain, not that either are funny but it is about breaking things.
[Saved in draft till 5-31-11]
[Over the weekend, I was ranting this ribble with a friend and really got riffing, or was it flushing. But I also pondered the genderless generic form of a "slut". Not until today did the word "monger" present itself to me. Somewhere before(of course), the word "scatology" may have entered the rhetoric. So I believe that the most useful appropriate word for the likes of most right wing talk peddlers, is scatmonger, as opposed to...well, I guess the left can have some scatmongers, but if it were understood how a septic tank works, it might be different.
[This is a deeply embedded and plumb'd ribble, with leaks in italics, and may be clarified or upgraded(updated) upon review.]

Technical Difficulties

Anomalies or Synchronicities? By definition they are hard to explain. But there was first the missing link that I referenced here and then the Eli Pariser "bubble" context. Then there is the Wrap(5***) problem* and follow up **.

* in context is biased
** also needs follow-up and labels
*** anomoly (2) / anomaly(1) (W itch Are)
[then there is the Al Gore Rhythm Spell Check problem, and follow ups.]
(note: numbers in (brackets) are links as found in search to check any change in the algorithms C-W r a p(5).)
Note: Psychology Label added, Physics and Philosophy already applied(6), not necessarily used well.
[By Jove I may have it.]
[Speaking of hunches Gingrich may be wit Mitt. He may be making Mitt and others look good, and working the churned media for his own Obamanation.]

Thursday, May 19th, 2011
Technical difficulties is no pun on Speaker Boehner calling the government broke or Ed Schultz calling it broken. Or was it? Given the anomalies and synchronicity theories who knows? But it was about looking at my own modus operandi and then blogspot having its difficulties and Eli Pariser's TED Talk on the Internet. The word follow-up(4) may have popped up and is applicable(2 to insert here).

Friday, May 20th, 2011
Speaking of difficulties, I had to correct yesterday being Friday. I guess I get a second shot. Note Psychology Label added for reasons then above and follow up, references "rational expectations" not to mention talk and guts. (Bush v. Lakoff) Speaking of talk, yesterday's inserts (2 became 3) are economic talks(YouTube) from INETeconomics.org. And a reminder that problem* above is a Koch Brothers spin. And note to self** is still pending* while I might return to Risk and Robustness.

Since it is Friday and I have several posts in draft that relate to this link, I might note that this is still under construction if I ever get back to it. But in this regard I will say that this is the first INET link I watched and have found several others I might recommend that have been imbedded above but will simple list here:

Raghuram Rajan: Delineating the Role of Government
Also see prior ** not fully read yet but gives context right off the bat***
Lance Taylor: Maynard's Revenge
Reforming the Macroeconomic Framework: Sushil Wadhwani
IMF Calls for New Economic Thinking: Or Does It?

Keynes in a box? I will not expound upon this academic pun except to note the room and a flip-flop. i.e. what I took from Huntington and what Fukuyama may have learned or changed.

*scroll or click but nfry = not fully read yet
**Why I am not an Austrian Economist
*** see can(under bat)

[Not So Frackin' Funny: Demand a...side. (or Borg)Not Pop'nCulture]

Justice?

It is more about narrative than justice.

Many will agree killing bin Laden is justice, some will call it an execution. Some say President Obama did not give President Bush enough credit. Some will say that he bin Laden deserves more. I think the poor ridge is just right. And to summit up:

As we do, we must also reaffirm that the United States is not -- and never will be -- at war with Islam. I’ve made clear, just as President Bush did shortly after 9/11, that our war is not against Islam. Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader; he was a mass murderer of Muslims. Indeed, al Qaeda has slaughtered scores of Muslims in many countries, including our own. So his demise should be welcomed by all who believe in peace and human dignity.

This is more than a mixed metaphor or mountain out of a moldy nursery tale*.

* link updated
[I have been meaning to focus on labels, updates and other project improvements. Here is a New Label**, The Golden Rule(also my photos) Also I should note my evolution from a lack of links to way too much linking. Hence the not so middle ground of this piece.]

** Now Labels label needs to be edited and updated to only New Label references. Now that is Poetic Justice or is it? It is another need to update or scroll over, to see the difference between search and labels.
[needed footnotes?]

[QED: Movement in one data point does not correlate with movement in another data point, especially when they are not in context or adjusted. Math is not a narrative, it is a process. Equations are more of a narrative but require enough data points and sufficient interpretation. There can be more jobless claims and more jobs added, which are independent of each other. OK, I have not QED'd anything but a hunch I just described and which apparently the data shows.]
[Semi-related? Calling it a gutsy call is not spiking a football. Let alone an improper linkage.]
[...not to mention right column navigations, scroll overs, see comments, labels and bold.]

An Inconvenient Platonics?

Is Atlas Shrugged a satirical parable without intent?
Or an Inconvenient Platonics
or Ironic Pedagogy and Not So novel?

[Footnote in Ribble: Obamanomics]
[Slippery* Slope? Or Domino Theory? Ribble Two?]

[* Re: 3:45 and on of Ed]Premium Support or Voucher is not the problem, it is the "do nothing" red herrings that jump the shark. The blue print is a navigational chart, that just may be the teeter totter of politics. It is called a bailout(read welfare) for corporations. Speaking of rocking intent.]
[Try Corner Hat Trick?]
[Back Log of De Mos?]
[Blast from the Past?]

Think Blue

Click Green. That's right or at least it is wiki.

Duh...Trinity. I use the above for segue...


[3-1-11 View of Airport Vortex(foreground right slope) to Bell Rock Vortex(distant smallest peak just right of center)]


[GPS: Closeup of Bell Rock, Looking back from Bell Rock.]

As I listened to Thom Hartmann, there is an appropriate* tangent to investigate later. As a caller pointed out it, is not about the rich and the poor, it is about people and capital. Would that be Cap I Toll ism?

*or maybe just interesting; not only in the nature of the trinity** of vortexes, but the wearing of the green or the red.

** self/others/balance
[Missing link : of google journey.[Not really even chaos.]